The Cubs continue to play tight games. After Monday's loss to the Nationals, they managed to split the remaining games on the home stand. The Nationals series was really a strange one in which almost every run from either side was scored as a result of a home run. The same process continued on Friday until the Cubs collapsed completely on defense in a game they might have won. They managed to right the ship Sunday, winning 2-1 in eleven innings against the Royals. I'll give you this, the Cubs are genuinely in every game they play. At least they are interesting.
The biggest weakness so far is the inconsistency of the bullpen, which is exacerbated by having to carry two starting pitchers, Wood and Jackson, who are not very good at starting games and also not especially suited to relief. This, of course, weakens the bench, which is not exactly a strong point either in the absence of Denorfia and LaStella due to injuries. Word is the Cubs will pursue Ben Zobrist, a sort of super-sub, if Oakland makes him available. This makes sense short-term. Long-term, if they are still in it, I kind of think they will make a run at Hamels or another dominant starter near the trade deadline or sooner. Wada has been good, but the Cubs do not seem to trust him beyond five innings in tight games, which, of course, is all they seem to play these days.
Sunday, May 31, 2015
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Tough Losses
The Cubs lost another tough one yesterday, 2-1. The wind was howling out of there, and it is a tribute to the pitching on both sides that there were only three solo home runs to account for all the scoring. That or everybody was just swinging for the fences and getting themselves out.
The Cubs have experienced a notable drop in quality at-bats lately and in run scoring as a result. Who can account for these apparent cycles of concentration or lack thereof? I still say that moving Castro to cleanup was and is a big mistake. The guy is barely hitting .200 in the spot. Bryant and Rizzo are always on base, so this is not a trivial concern.
I've seen some rumblings on some of the Cubs boards and blogs about Maddon's managerial style. He has always had the reputation as something of a tinkerer with a tendency to over-manage. Actually, his lineups have been pretty stable thus far, but his bullpen management has, to my mind, been a little eccentric.
There is an old adage that managers do not win games, but they can lose them. I'm not saying that Maddon has cost the Cubs more games than the usual generic manager by his pitching moves, but the plain fact is that when you pull your starter in the fifth or sixth inning, you are asking for trouble. Relievers, except for the elite eighth and ninth inning guys and the young guys you are bringing along, are in the bullpen for a reason. They are not good enough to start.
In yesterday's game, Wada was in the 80 pitch range starting the inning. Sure, he was pitching in and out of trouble, but he was strong enough to strike out Harper to start the frame. Worst case scenario is one of the subsequent right-handed hitters gets on base or hits a solo homer. OK, maybe you wait to go to the bullpen and buy yourself an inning. Maddon instead pulled Wada. Grimm gave up the solo homer that won the game.
So you can certainly justify the move based on the matchups, but it is not the first time it has happened to the Cubs and you may want to rethink this approach given the fairly woeful results thus far.
The Cubs have experienced a notable drop in quality at-bats lately and in run scoring as a result. Who can account for these apparent cycles of concentration or lack thereof? I still say that moving Castro to cleanup was and is a big mistake. The guy is barely hitting .200 in the spot. Bryant and Rizzo are always on base, so this is not a trivial concern.
I've seen some rumblings on some of the Cubs boards and blogs about Maddon's managerial style. He has always had the reputation as something of a tinkerer with a tendency to over-manage. Actually, his lineups have been pretty stable thus far, but his bullpen management has, to my mind, been a little eccentric.
There is an old adage that managers do not win games, but they can lose them. I'm not saying that Maddon has cost the Cubs more games than the usual generic manager by his pitching moves, but the plain fact is that when you pull your starter in the fifth or sixth inning, you are asking for trouble. Relievers, except for the elite eighth and ninth inning guys and the young guys you are bringing along, are in the bullpen for a reason. They are not good enough to start.
In yesterday's game, Wada was in the 80 pitch range starting the inning. Sure, he was pitching in and out of trouble, but he was strong enough to strike out Harper to start the frame. Worst case scenario is one of the subsequent right-handed hitters gets on base or hits a solo homer. OK, maybe you wait to go to the bullpen and buy yourself an inning. Maddon instead pulled Wada. Grimm gave up the solo homer that won the game.
So you can certainly justify the move based on the matchups, but it is not the first time it has happened to the Cubs and you may want to rethink this approach given the fairly woeful results thus far.
Saturday, May 23, 2015
An Ugly Loss
The Cubs lost a really ugly game in 13 innings last night after apparently sewing up a victory with a two-run rally in the tenth. They are 2-2 on a road trip where they should be 4-0.
In yesterday's loss, it was the bullpen that let them down, more particularly, Hector Rondon, who blew the save by being overly aggressive in pitching to Paul Goldschmidt, one of only two genuinely good hitters their opponents have. You could have made a case to walk Goldschmidt with first base open even though it brings the winning run to the plate. At least you could have pitched around him a little bit once you were ahead in the count.
I don't think the Cubs have an alternative closer to Rondon, but I do think they may overvalue his stuff. He has great stuff, but he has been a little careless in several appearances. So far he has three blown saves, though only two have resulted in subsequent defeats.
Anyway, the Cubs continued to struggle to get home those key runs. They had several chances to put the game away in extra innings last night. This has been a tendency for the team lately. Partly that may just be a case of the league catching up with some of their young talent.
I don't have any hard evidence that the lineup is at fault, but I think a lot of the emphasis on having that righty/lefty alternation is misplaced. In any case, the Cubs were scoring more runs, or at least it is my impression they were scoring more runs, when they had Soler batting second and alternated Rizzo and Bryant third and fourth. This let them put Montero in the fifth slot and drop Castro to sixth, a position he is much better suited to than cleanup if only because he hits so many ground balls that often result in double plays.
There are some rumors the Cubs are kicking the tires on Rafael Soriano. Not sure I buy this move. Soriano was a dominant reliever for a while, but he kind of went into freefall the second half of last year with the Nationals. He's 35 and I cannot recall many relievers like him who come back. At the end of last season, he was more or less the equivalent of Jason Motte or worse.
In yesterday's loss, it was the bullpen that let them down, more particularly, Hector Rondon, who blew the save by being overly aggressive in pitching to Paul Goldschmidt, one of only two genuinely good hitters their opponents have. You could have made a case to walk Goldschmidt with first base open even though it brings the winning run to the plate. At least you could have pitched around him a little bit once you were ahead in the count.
I don't think the Cubs have an alternative closer to Rondon, but I do think they may overvalue his stuff. He has great stuff, but he has been a little careless in several appearances. So far he has three blown saves, though only two have resulted in subsequent defeats.
Anyway, the Cubs continued to struggle to get home those key runs. They had several chances to put the game away in extra innings last night. This has been a tendency for the team lately. Partly that may just be a case of the league catching up with some of their young talent.
I don't have any hard evidence that the lineup is at fault, but I think a lot of the emphasis on having that righty/lefty alternation is misplaced. In any case, the Cubs were scoring more runs, or at least it is my impression they were scoring more runs, when they had Soler batting second and alternated Rizzo and Bryant third and fourth. This let them put Montero in the fifth slot and drop Castro to sixth, a position he is much better suited to than cleanup if only because he hits so many ground balls that often result in double plays.
There are some rumors the Cubs are kicking the tires on Rafael Soriano. Not sure I buy this move. Soriano was a dominant reliever for a while, but he kind of went into freefall the second half of last year with the Nationals. He's 35 and I cannot recall many relievers like him who come back. At the end of last season, he was more or less the equivalent of Jason Motte or worse.
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Sloppy Game
The Cubs wasted a real gem by Jason Hammel to lose to the Padres 4-3. They made three errors, really awful errors and all three errors resulted in runs. They also only scored on home runs and struck out so often I lost count. In any case, did I mention how much I hate Castro in the cleanup spot?
On another note, the Cubs did some roster realignment. By and large, these were needed moves. I've always kind of liked Welington Castillo and was a little sorry to see him go. However, carrying three catchers was a luxury the team could not afford. They got a pretty decent bullpen guy in return.
In other moves, they sent Schlitter packing, hopefully for good. This guy gets no one out. They also DFAed Phil Coke, a move we had anticipated. Coke wasn't getting people out either. Besides Wada, the Cubs promoted Junior Lake, who will presumably platoon with Coughlin in left field. They also brought up Baxter, which is kind of a head-scratcher. Baxter is pretty much a career minor leaguer, but one supposes they needed a left-handed bat off the bench and LaStella was still hurt and Alcantara was not exactly burning up the league at Iowa.
On another note, the Cubs did some roster realignment. By and large, these were needed moves. I've always kind of liked Welington Castillo and was a little sorry to see him go. However, carrying three catchers was a luxury the team could not afford. They got a pretty decent bullpen guy in return.
In other moves, they sent Schlitter packing, hopefully for good. This guy gets no one out. They also DFAed Phil Coke, a move we had anticipated. Coke wasn't getting people out either. Besides Wada, the Cubs promoted Junior Lake, who will presumably platoon with Coughlin in left field. They also brought up Baxter, which is kind of a head-scratcher. Baxter is pretty much a career minor leaguer, but one supposes they needed a left-handed bat off the bench and LaStella was still hurt and Alcantara was not exactly burning up the league at Iowa.
Monday, May 18, 2015
Home Stand
The Cubs won six of seven on the home stand and looked really good doing so. Arrieta was a little unlucky to lose the pitchers' duel Sunday afternoon. The run he gave up to the Pirates was mainly the result of a fluke popup double. The Cubs ran themselves out of some chances with bad base running and, in general, just could not collect that big hit. I've got to say the one impressive thing about the Pirates is their outfield, the Polanco flop notwithstanding. They ran down a bunch of potential extra-base hits all weekend and kept the Pirates in the game.
Rumor is the Cubs will bring up Wada to take Travis Wood's spot in the rotation. Actually not so much rumor, as Maddon announced he will start on Wednesday. This is really a needed change. Whenever the Cubs have to remove their starter in the sixth inning or earlier, it spells trouble, and Wood, at his best, was good for only six innings. A move to the pen might help him out. His stuff is just not that good and he has to work hard to get outs, which usually means his pitch count gets up there pretty fast.
That bullpen is a mess right now. An off-day and the rest achieved Saturday and Sunday for the main players will help, but there is just no way they can carry fourteen pitchers and remain competitive, especially with three catchers. No doubt Schlitter will hit the road to allow Wada's promotion, but it is an open question who else will need to be sent down. Maddon loves Rosscup, but he may be the only guy left with options, and they need to bring up another position player, presumably Lake or Denorfia if he has healed. LaStella got hurt again yesterday during his rehab assignment, so he is out of the picture. Otherwise, they are going to have to DFA one of the veterans. Coke and Motte have not exactly lit things up all year and probably are pretty marginal to the Cubs long term plans, so it could be one of them.
I saw a piece on MLB Trade Rumors that the Cubs were thinking about bringing up Baez again. Apparently he is hot down at Iowa. I rather think this is a big mistake. First off, twenty at-bats at AAA isn't much of sample and he is still striking out a third of the time. The other question is where would he play. The speculation was he would be moved to third base, with Bryant going to the outfield. The problem is that Bryant is playing really well defensively at third and Baez has, to my knowledge, never played there.
Rumor is the Cubs will bring up Wada to take Travis Wood's spot in the rotation. Actually not so much rumor, as Maddon announced he will start on Wednesday. This is really a needed change. Whenever the Cubs have to remove their starter in the sixth inning or earlier, it spells trouble, and Wood, at his best, was good for only six innings. A move to the pen might help him out. His stuff is just not that good and he has to work hard to get outs, which usually means his pitch count gets up there pretty fast.
That bullpen is a mess right now. An off-day and the rest achieved Saturday and Sunday for the main players will help, but there is just no way they can carry fourteen pitchers and remain competitive, especially with three catchers. No doubt Schlitter will hit the road to allow Wada's promotion, but it is an open question who else will need to be sent down. Maddon loves Rosscup, but he may be the only guy left with options, and they need to bring up another position player, presumably Lake or Denorfia if he has healed. LaStella got hurt again yesterday during his rehab assignment, so he is out of the picture. Otherwise, they are going to have to DFA one of the veterans. Coke and Motte have not exactly lit things up all year and probably are pretty marginal to the Cubs long term plans, so it could be one of them.
I saw a piece on MLB Trade Rumors that the Cubs were thinking about bringing up Baez again. Apparently he is hot down at Iowa. I rather think this is a big mistake. First off, twenty at-bats at AAA isn't much of sample and he is still striking out a third of the time. The other question is where would he play. The speculation was he would be moved to third base, with Bryant going to the outfield. The problem is that Bryant is playing really well defensively at third and Baez has, to my knowledge, never played there.
Friday, May 15, 2015
Cubs Sweep Mets
The Cubs came back today to sweep the Mets after falling behind 5-1. Travis Wood turned in another sub-par performance, lasting only into the fifth inning. However, because the Cubs got deep performances from the previous two starters, they were able to use their better relievers to save the day. They also showed a lot of moxie to come back against some pretty good Mets pitching. All in all, a very satisfying series. After Wednesday, I had thought they had a real shot to sweep even with Wood on the mound.
If I were the Mets, I would not be too quick to go all in on this season. It's going to take a lot more than a hitting shortstop to resurrect their offense and, to be honest, the only pitcher who was really dominant against the Cubs was Harper.
The Cubs, on the other hand, look like they are in good shape to contend. I'm not sure how long they can put up with Wood as a fifth starter. Of course, Jackson is not the alternative. Internally, they just have Wada down at Iowa to replace him. Then the question becomes what to do with Wood and Jackson as well, since they cannot be optioned.
If I were the Mets, I would not be too quick to go all in on this season. It's going to take a lot more than a hitting shortstop to resurrect their offense and, to be honest, the only pitcher who was really dominant against the Cubs was Harper.
The Cubs, on the other hand, look like they are in good shape to contend. I'm not sure how long they can put up with Wood as a fifth starter. Of course, Jackson is not the alternative. Internally, they just have Wada down at Iowa to replace him. Then the question becomes what to do with Wood and Jackson as well, since they cannot be optioned.
Tuesday, May 12, 2015
Cubs Look Good Again
Mainly, I guess, because they have had two plus starts from their two best pitchers, which has given the bullpen some respite. Arrieta looked really good on Tuesday after he settled in, and Lester looked good as well before he ran out of gas in the sixth inning on Monday. If the Cubs get seven innings from Hammel tomorrow, they have a shot at sweeping the series even though Wood is scheduled to start Thursday afternoon.
Kris Bryant has homered in consecutive games. More importantly, he has just been having quality at-bats lately and has hustled out several infield hits, etc. Maddon had all he could do in the post-game interview to avoid gushing comparisons to Roy Hobbs.
On the trade front, rumors are swirling again about a possible trade of Castro or another infielder to the Mets for a pitching prospect, presumably Syndergaard or the lefty Steven Matz. Syndergaard looked pretty good in his debut Tuesday night, and Matz is thought by some to be even better. While the teams do match up pretty well in terms of needs and strengths, I wonder how real some of the talk is right now, especially as both teams are major market clubs that are assessing their chances of winning now as opposed to the near future. They are likely to wait a bit before they pull the trigger on anything, and that strikes me as the right course for both teams.
I have a couple of thoughts on a potential deal. The Mets want a shortstop who can hit now, and that means Castro or Russell. Russell is probably untouchable now, or at least an asset the Cubs are not thinking of moving near term. I have always had mixed feelings about Castro, and, at one time, I was one of his harsher critics. I have come around lately to seeing his value, especially given the less than stellar debut of Javier Baez, at one time the heir apparent.
Castro has matured into a pretty decent shortstop and also a pretty decent hitter. Dropped down to the sixth slot in the order, Castro has developed a little more patience and pitch recognition at the plate. Now that he is part of a team that gets on base a lot more than in the past, he is getting a lot of RBI chances. So far, he has driven in 20 runs, which leads the team. I would not want to move a guy who is having a good year unless I were sure he could be replaced with an equally productive bat and glove. Right now, that replacement is certainly not Baez. Given Castro's performance so far, I think the Cubs are looking at matters in the same way. Barring a trade, it is likely the Cubs will have Russell and Castro swap positions when the season is over.
I can see the Cubs packaging Baez and some other prospects who are blocked in a trade for an established starting pitcher. I think the Cubs are looking more or less for more established players unless they fall so far behind the Cards that the season is a loss. Neither Syndergaard nor Matz really match this need. Hamels does, and I would not be surprised to see the Cubs take a shot at him later this year, especially if they stay close and the Phillies are still in sell mode.
Kris Bryant has homered in consecutive games. More importantly, he has just been having quality at-bats lately and has hustled out several infield hits, etc. Maddon had all he could do in the post-game interview to avoid gushing comparisons to Roy Hobbs.
On the trade front, rumors are swirling again about a possible trade of Castro or another infielder to the Mets for a pitching prospect, presumably Syndergaard or the lefty Steven Matz. Syndergaard looked pretty good in his debut Tuesday night, and Matz is thought by some to be even better. While the teams do match up pretty well in terms of needs and strengths, I wonder how real some of the talk is right now, especially as both teams are major market clubs that are assessing their chances of winning now as opposed to the near future. They are likely to wait a bit before they pull the trigger on anything, and that strikes me as the right course for both teams.
I have a couple of thoughts on a potential deal. The Mets want a shortstop who can hit now, and that means Castro or Russell. Russell is probably untouchable now, or at least an asset the Cubs are not thinking of moving near term. I have always had mixed feelings about Castro, and, at one time, I was one of his harsher critics. I have come around lately to seeing his value, especially given the less than stellar debut of Javier Baez, at one time the heir apparent.
Castro has matured into a pretty decent shortstop and also a pretty decent hitter. Dropped down to the sixth slot in the order, Castro has developed a little more patience and pitch recognition at the plate. Now that he is part of a team that gets on base a lot more than in the past, he is getting a lot of RBI chances. So far, he has driven in 20 runs, which leads the team. I would not want to move a guy who is having a good year unless I were sure he could be replaced with an equally productive bat and glove. Right now, that replacement is certainly not Baez. Given Castro's performance so far, I think the Cubs are looking at matters in the same way. Barring a trade, it is likely the Cubs will have Russell and Castro swap positions when the season is over.
I can see the Cubs packaging Baez and some other prospects who are blocked in a trade for an established starting pitcher. I think the Cubs are looking more or less for more established players unless they fall so far behind the Cards that the season is a loss. Neither Syndergaard nor Matz really match this need. Hamels does, and I would not be surprised to see the Cubs take a shot at him later this year, especially if they stay close and the Phillies are still in sell mode.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)